https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=331727 The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai allowed the appeal in a refund claim case based on unjust enrichment. The Tribunal found that the Appellant, involved in the third round of litigation on the matter, was eligible for the refund as previous orders directed the refund and the confirmed amounts were beyond the limitation period. The Tribunal emphasized the binding nature of previous directives and clarified that the lower authorities erred in rejecting the refund claim. The decision set aside the impugned order and granted consequential relief to the Appellant in accordance with previous final orders, highlighting the Appellant's entitlement to the refund. en-us Thu, 21 Jul 2016 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 31 Aug 2016 09:51:54 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=331727 The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai allowed the appeal in a refund claim case based on unjust enrichment. The Tribunal found that the Appellant, involved in the third round of litigation on the matter, was eligible for the refund as previous orders directed the refund and the confirmed amounts were beyond the limitation period. The Tribunal emphasized the binding nature of previous directives and clarified that the lower authorities erred in rejecting the refund claim. The decision set aside the impugned order and granted consequential relief to the Appellant in accordance with previous final orders, highlighting the Appellant's entitlement to the refund. Case-Laws Central Excise Thu, 21 Jul 2016 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=331727