<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (8) TMI 1109 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=331725</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal of M/s.Brintons Carpets Asia Pvt. Ltd., overturning the rejection of their refund claim based on limitation. The Tribunal held that the letters sent by the appellant to the authorities constituted a protest against the duty payment, even though the word &quot;protest&quot; was not explicitly used. Consequently, the limitation clause could not be invoked against the appellant, and the refund claim rejection was reversed. This case emphasizes the significance of establishing a protest against disputed duty payments and applying relevant legal provisions to support refund claims in such circumstances.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 29 Jul 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 31 Aug 2016 09:51:13 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=439644" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (8) TMI 1109 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=331725</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal of M/s.Brintons Carpets Asia Pvt. Ltd., overturning the rejection of their refund claim based on limitation. The Tribunal held that the letters sent by the appellant to the authorities constituted a protest against the duty payment, even though the word &quot;protest&quot; was not explicitly used. Consequently, the limitation clause could not be invoked against the appellant, and the refund claim rejection was reversed. This case emphasizes the significance of establishing a protest against disputed duty payments and applying relevant legal provisions to support refund claims in such circumstances.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 29 Jul 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=331725</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>