https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=331719 The case involved a dispute over the inclusion of galleries in stenters' measurements. The tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, rejecting the Revenue's argument. Regarding the suo moto abatement, the tribunal found in favor of the appellant, deeming the abatement regularized and setting aside interest and penalty but requiring payment of the duty amount and associated interest. The impugned order was modified accordingly. The judgment was delivered on 26/07/2016 by Shri Ramesh Nair, Member (Judicial) at the Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai. en-us Tue, 26 Jul 2016 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 31 Aug 2016 09:50:58 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=331719 The case involved a dispute over the inclusion of galleries in stenters' measurements. The tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, rejecting the Revenue's argument. Regarding the suo moto abatement, the tribunal found in favor of the appellant, deeming the abatement regularized and setting aside interest and penalty but requiring payment of the duty amount and associated interest. The impugned order was modified accordingly. The judgment was delivered on 26/07/2016 by Shri Ramesh Nair, Member (Judicial) at the Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai. Case-Laws Central Excise Tue, 26 Jul 2016 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=331719