https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=331715 The Tribunal set aside the order-in-appeal demanding a differential duty from the appellant for allegedly charging lower prices to specific buyers. The Tribunal remanded the matter back to the first appellate authority, emphasizing the permissibility of different prices for different classes of buyers under Section 4 of the Central Excise Act. The Tribunal directed a reconsideration of the issue while ensuring principles of natural justice are followed, allowing the appeal by way of remand and keeping all issues open for further examination. en-us Fri, 08 Jul 2016 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 31 Aug 2016 09:50:48 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=331715 The Tribunal set aside the order-in-appeal demanding a differential duty from the appellant for allegedly charging lower prices to specific buyers. The Tribunal remanded the matter back to the first appellate authority, emphasizing the permissibility of different prices for different classes of buyers under Section 4 of the Central Excise Act. The Tribunal directed a reconsideration of the issue while ensuring principles of natural justice are followed, allowing the appeal by way of remand and keeping all issues open for further examination. Case-Laws Central Excise Fri, 08 Jul 2016 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=331715