<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (8) TMI 1087 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=331703</link>
    <description>The ITAT Mumbai allowed the appeal in favor of the assessee concerning additions made to the total income as income from other sources. The tribunal ruled that the amount received as a corpus fund was a capital receipt and not taxable income. Additionally, the rent paid by the developer during project development was considered compensation and not income, thus not part of the assessee&#039;s income. The appeal was partly allowed, emphasizing the non-taxability of capital receipts unless specified in the Income Tax Act.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 12 Aug 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 16 Apr 2026 15:22:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=439616" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (8) TMI 1087 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=331703</link>
      <description>The ITAT Mumbai allowed the appeal in favor of the assessee concerning additions made to the total income as income from other sources. The tribunal ruled that the amount received as a corpus fund was a capital receipt and not taxable income. Additionally, the rent paid by the developer during project development was considered compensation and not income, thus not part of the assessee&#039;s income. The appeal was partly allowed, emphasizing the non-taxability of capital receipts unless specified in the Income Tax Act.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 12 Aug 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=331703</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>