<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (8) TMI 1086 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=331702</link>
    <description>The ITAT Delhi allowed the appeal, directing the deletion of the total addition of Rs. 16,11,500 in respect of unexplained cash credit under sec. 68 of the Act. The ITAT found that the Assessing Officer failed to disprove the evidence presented by the assessee, who established the genuineness of the claim with detailed evidence for both cash and cheque transactions. The order was pronounced on 26.07.2016.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 26 Jul 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 31 Aug 2016 08:53:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=439615" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (8) TMI 1086 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=331702</link>
      <description>The ITAT Delhi allowed the appeal, directing the deletion of the total addition of Rs. 16,11,500 in respect of unexplained cash credit under sec. 68 of the Act. The ITAT found that the Assessing Officer failed to disprove the evidence presented by the assessee, who established the genuineness of the claim with detailed evidence for both cash and cheque transactions. The order was pronounced on 26.07.2016.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 26 Jul 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=331702</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>