<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (8) TMI 1079 - ITAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=331695</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee-company, holding that the loans received did not constitute deemed dividends under Section 2(22)(e) of the Income Tax Act as the assessee was not a shareholder in the lending companies. The Tribunal allowed the appeal, stating that deemed dividend tax is applicable only to shareholders. The department was advised to pursue appropriate legal action against the actual shareholder for taxing the deemed dividend.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 20 Jul 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 31 Aug 2016 09:04:14 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=439608" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (8) TMI 1079 - ITAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=331695</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee-company, holding that the loans received did not constitute deemed dividends under Section 2(22)(e) of the Income Tax Act as the assessee was not a shareholder in the lending companies. The Tribunal allowed the appeal, stating that deemed dividend tax is applicable only to shareholders. The department was advised to pursue appropriate legal action against the actual shareholder for taxing the deemed dividend.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 20 Jul 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=331695</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>