https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=331689 The Tribunal set aside the revocation of registration and forfeiture of security deposit imposed on the appellant, a registered authorized courier, for alleged contravention of regulations. The Tribunal found the revocation premature as the appellant had not contravened any regulations and had not commenced operations. The matter was remanded for re-verification of facilities and a fresh decision on continuation as an authorized courier, considering the appellant's commitments to upgrade infrastructure. The impugned order was overturned, and the case was sent back for reconsideration by the Original Authority. en-us Fri, 29 Jul 2016 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 04 Jan 2017 12:53:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=331689 The Tribunal set aside the revocation of registration and forfeiture of security deposit imposed on the appellant, a registered authorized courier, for alleged contravention of regulations. The Tribunal found the revocation premature as the appellant had not contravened any regulations and had not commenced operations. The matter was remanded for re-verification of facilities and a fresh decision on continuation as an authorized courier, considering the appellant's commitments to upgrade infrastructure. The impugned order was overturned, and the case was sent back for reconsideration by the Original Authority. Case-Laws Customs Fri, 29 Jul 2016 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=331689