<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (8) TMI 1063 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=331679</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld duty liability on the main appellant for repacked and labeled imported parts, citing precedent. The extended period for demand invocation was deemed valid due to the appellant&#039;s awareness. The appellant was granted cum duty benefit, aligning with legal precedents. Eligibility for CENVAT credit on CVD paid was acknowledged, pending document verification. The penalty on the individual was overturned as no specific role was attributed. The case was remanded for re-quantification considering benefits and credit eligibility.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 25 Aug 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 17 Feb 2017 16:07:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=439583" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (8) TMI 1063 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=331679</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld duty liability on the main appellant for repacked and labeled imported parts, citing precedent. The extended period for demand invocation was deemed valid due to the appellant&#039;s awareness. The appellant was granted cum duty benefit, aligning with legal precedents. Eligibility for CENVAT credit on CVD paid was acknowledged, pending document verification. The penalty on the individual was overturned as no specific role was attributed. The case was remanded for re-quantification considering benefits and credit eligibility.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 25 Aug 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=331679</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>