<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (8) TMI 1060 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=331676</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled that the Appellant was not eligible for Cenvat Credit on maintenance and repair services of staff quarters and items used in support structures of machinery. The penalty imposed on the Appellant was set aside due to conflicting case laws on the issue. The appeal was rejected concerning the confirmation of demand and interest, but the penalty was overturned.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 23 Aug 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 30 Aug 2016 20:52:58 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=439580" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (8) TMI 1060 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=331676</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled that the Appellant was not eligible for Cenvat Credit on maintenance and repair services of staff quarters and items used in support structures of machinery. The penalty imposed on the Appellant was set aside due to conflicting case laws on the issue. The appeal was rejected concerning the confirmation of demand and interest, but the penalty was overturned.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 23 Aug 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=331676</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>