<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (2) TMI 146 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=4617</link>
    <description>The court held that the conditions for reopening the assessment under Section 147 after four years were not met. It found that there was no failure to disclose material facts and the reopening was based on a mere change of opinion. Consequently, the court allowed the writ petition, quashing the notice under Section 148 and the order rejecting objections, with no costs awarded.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 13 Feb 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 26 Jul 2008 09:36:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=43958" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (2) TMI 146 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=4617</link>
      <description>The court held that the conditions for reopening the assessment under Section 147 after four years were not met. It found that there was no failure to disclose material facts and the reopening was based on a mere change of opinion. Consequently, the court allowed the writ petition, quashing the notice under Section 148 and the order rejecting objections, with no costs awarded.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 13 Feb 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=4617</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>