<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (5) TMI 683 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=185861</link>
    <description>The appeal was allowed, and the disallowance of Rs. 3,90,267 under section 14A for expenses related to earning exempt dividend income was deleted. The Tribunal emphasized the necessity of a direct connection between incurring expenses and earning exempt income for any disallowance to be valid, citing precedents and noting that the provisions for quantification of disallowance were not retrospective and lacked a prescribed computation method.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 09 May 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 30 Aug 2016 17:48:58 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=439571" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (5) TMI 683 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=185861</link>
      <description>The appeal was allowed, and the disallowance of Rs. 3,90,267 under section 14A for expenses related to earning exempt dividend income was deleted. The Tribunal emphasized the necessity of a direct connection between incurring expenses and earning exempt income for any disallowance to be valid, citing precedents and noting that the provisions for quantification of disallowance were not retrospective and lacked a prescribed computation method.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 09 May 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=185861</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>