<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (4) TMI 1134 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=185842</link>
    <description>The tribunal quashed the reopening of the assessment as it amounted to a change of opinion, citing precedents prohibiting such actions. Consequently, the assessment order was annulled, allowing the appeal on grounds 1 and 2. The additional income disclosed during the survey was deemed ineligible for deduction under section 80HHC. The appeal was partly allowed, with ground 3 becoming irrelevant, and ground 4 being dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 09 Apr 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 30 Aug 2016 12:01:08 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=439547" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (4) TMI 1134 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=185842</link>
      <description>The tribunal quashed the reopening of the assessment as it amounted to a change of opinion, citing precedents prohibiting such actions. Consequently, the assessment order was annulled, allowing the appeal on grounds 1 and 2. The additional income disclosed during the survey was deemed ineligible for deduction under section 80HHC. The appeal was partly allowed, with ground 3 becoming irrelevant, and ground 4 being dismissed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 09 Apr 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=185842</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>