<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (9) TMI 1184 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=185841</link>
    <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal, directing the deletion of disallowances related to website development, royalty expenses for OST rights, royalty claim under section 40(a)(i), and royalty expenses for studio album recordings. The Tribunal also ordered a re-examination of computer software expenses in line with established principles. The decision was issued on 9th September 2010.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 09 Sep 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 30 Aug 2016 11:41:22 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=439545" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (9) TMI 1184 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=185841</link>
      <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal, directing the deletion of disallowances related to website development, royalty expenses for OST rights, royalty claim under section 40(a)(i), and royalty expenses for studio album recordings. The Tribunal also ordered a re-examination of computer software expenses in line with established principles. The decision was issued on 9th September 2010.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 09 Sep 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=185841</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>