<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (8) TMI 1053 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=331669</link>
    <description>The petitioner sought promotion to Assistant General Manager and challenged a seniority list, citing disparities in promotions compared to another employee. The petitioner requested the promotion of the other employee to Deputy General Manager based on a concluded DPC. The court allowed the petition&#039;s withdrawal on the condition that a detailed representation be made to respondent No.1, with a decision expected within three weeks.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 06 Apr 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 15 Nov 2016 12:01:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=439540" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (8) TMI 1053 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=331669</link>
      <description>The petitioner sought promotion to Assistant General Manager and challenged a seniority list, citing disparities in promotions compared to another employee. The petitioner requested the promotion of the other employee to Deputy General Manager based on a concluded DPC. The court allowed the petition&#039;s withdrawal on the condition that a detailed representation be made to respondent No.1, with a decision expected within three weeks.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 06 Apr 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=331669</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>