https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=185836 Conference charges used in relation to business activity and sales promotion were treated as input service under Rule 2(l) of the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004, because the expenditure had the requisite nexus with the assessee's business. The Tribunal noted that the same Bench had allowed the benefit on identical facts earlier, and therefore the denial of Cenvat credit was unsustainable. The impugned order was set aside and credit was allowed in favour of the assessee. en-us Tue, 27 Oct 2015 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 30 Aug 2016 11:05:12 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=185836 Conference charges used in relation to business activity and sales promotion were treated as input service under Rule 2(l) of the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004, because the expenditure had the requisite nexus with the assessee's business. The Tribunal noted that the same Bench had allowed the benefit on identical facts earlier, and therefore the denial of Cenvat credit was unsustainable. The impugned order was set aside and credit was allowed in favour of the assessee. Case-Laws Central Excise Tue, 27 Oct 2015 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=185836