<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (8) TMI 1046 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=331662</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to delete the disallowance made by the Assessing Officer under Section 40(a)(ia) of the Income Tax Act, 1961, as there was no evidence of a contract with the dumper owners/drivers. The Tribunal also supported the deletion of the addition made by the AO regarding the taxation of trade credits, finding the AO&#039;s actions unsupported and contradictory. Consequently, the revenue&#039;s appeal was dismissed in its entirety.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 20 Jul 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 30 Aug 2016 10:59:49 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=439520" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (8) TMI 1046 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=331662</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to delete the disallowance made by the Assessing Officer under Section 40(a)(ia) of the Income Tax Act, 1961, as there was no evidence of a contract with the dumper owners/drivers. The Tribunal also supported the deletion of the addition made by the AO regarding the taxation of trade credits, finding the AO&#039;s actions unsupported and contradictory. Consequently, the revenue&#039;s appeal was dismissed in its entirety.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 20 Jul 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=331662</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>