<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (8) TMI 1038 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=331654</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the re-opening of the assessment under Section 147 of the Income Tax Act after four years, ruling that income chargeable to tax had indeed escaped assessment. Additionally, the Tribunal affirmed the treatment of the sale of agricultural land as income from business, considering the coordinated efforts in purchasing and selling the land to a property developer. The appeal of the assessee was dismissed, and the decision was pronounced on 22nd July 2016 in Chennai.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 22 Jul 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 30 Aug 2016 10:59:15 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=439508" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (8) TMI 1038 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=331654</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the re-opening of the assessment under Section 147 of the Income Tax Act after four years, ruling that income chargeable to tax had indeed escaped assessment. Additionally, the Tribunal affirmed the treatment of the sale of agricultural land as income from business, considering the coordinated efforts in purchasing and selling the land to a property developer. The appeal of the assessee was dismissed, and the decision was pronounced on 22nd July 2016 in Chennai.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 22 Jul 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=331654</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>