<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (8) TMI 1036 - ITAT VISAKHAPATNAM</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=331652</link>
    <description>The ITAT dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeals and upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s order, determining that payments by NHAI to agencies for Toll fee collection were subject to TDS under section 194C, not 194H. The ITAT agreed with the CIT(A)&#039;s finding that the contract constituted labor supply, not agency, based on agreement terms and payment arrangements. The assessee&#039;s cross objections were also rejected.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 22 Jul 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 30 Aug 2016 10:41:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=439506" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (8) TMI 1036 - ITAT VISAKHAPATNAM</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=331652</link>
      <description>The ITAT dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeals and upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s order, determining that payments by NHAI to agencies for Toll fee collection were subject to TDS under section 194C, not 194H. The ITAT agreed with the CIT(A)&#039;s finding that the contract constituted labor supply, not agency, based on agreement terms and payment arrangements. The assessee&#039;s cross objections were also rejected.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 22 Jul 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=331652</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>