<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (3) TMI 541 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=185828</link>
    <description>The court set aside previous orders and remanded the matter to the assessing officer for fresh consideration as crucial aspects, including the borrowing made by the appellant and reflection in accounts, were overlooked. The appeal was allowed, emphasizing the importance of proper verification and consideration of relevant evidence in income tax assessments.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 20 Mar 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 10 Jul 2017 10:10:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=439495" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (3) TMI 541 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=185828</link>
      <description>The court set aside previous orders and remanded the matter to the assessing officer for fresh consideration as crucial aspects, including the borrowing made by the appellant and reflection in accounts, were overlooked. The appeal was allowed, emphasizing the importance of proper verification and consideration of relevant evidence in income tax assessments.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 20 Mar 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=185828</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>