<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2007 (12) TMI 163 - CESTAT, AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=4607</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the Department&#039;s approach in classifying goods under chapter heading 6309.06 for duty calculation, deeming it reasonable and legally sound. The Tribunal also supported the Commissioner&#039;s decision on interest liability, clarifying that interest should be demanded based on the revised duty amount. The appeal was disposed of in favor of the Department, affirming their method for duty calculation and interest payment.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 10 Dec 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 16 Jul 2008 00:00:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=43948" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2007 (12) TMI 163 - CESTAT, AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=4607</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the Department&#039;s approach in classifying goods under chapter heading 6309.06 for duty calculation, deeming it reasonable and legally sound. The Tribunal also supported the Commissioner&#039;s decision on interest liability, clarifying that interest should be demanded based on the revised duty amount. The appeal was disposed of in favor of the Department, affirming their method for duty calculation and interest payment.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 10 Dec 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=4607</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>