https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=185806 The Tribunal dismissed the revenue's appeal, upholding the CIT (A)'s decisions on all grounds. The Tribunal found that the assessee had provided sufficient evidence to substantiate the share application money, unsecured loans, and investments in fixed assets and plots. The AO's failure to pursue further inquiries or verify the documents during the remand stage was a significant factor in the Tribunal's decision. en-us Wed, 27 Jan 2016 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 29 Aug 2016 13:28:23 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=185806 The Tribunal dismissed the revenue's appeal, upholding the CIT (A)'s decisions on all grounds. The Tribunal found that the assessee had provided sufficient evidence to substantiate the share application money, unsecured loans, and investments in fixed assets and plots. The AO's failure to pursue further inquiries or verify the documents during the remand stage was a significant factor in the Tribunal's decision. Case-Laws Income Tax Wed, 27 Jan 2016 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=185806