<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Refund Granted for Unjust Enrichment: No Excise Duty Passed to NHAI, Certification Confirms Fixed Contract Amount.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=30963</link>
    <description>Unjust enrichment - Refund claim - The contract is for a fixed amount and it has been categorically recorded in the impugned order that no excise duty incidence has been passed on by the respondent to NHAI. NHAI also categorically certified to that effect - refund allowed - AT</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 29 Aug 2016 12:54:54 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 29 Aug 2016 12:54:54 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=439445" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Refund Granted for Unjust Enrichment: No Excise Duty Passed to NHAI, Certification Confirms Fixed Contract Amount.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=30963</link>
      <description>Unjust enrichment - Refund claim - The contract is for a fixed amount and it has been categorically recorded in the impugned order that no excise duty incidence has been passed on by the respondent to NHAI. NHAI also categorically certified to that effect - refund allowed - AT</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 29 Aug 2016 12:54:54 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=30963</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>