<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (8) TMI 1019 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=331635</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the permission granted under Cenvat Rules for sending kraft paper to a job worker for further processing into carton boxes, considering kraft paper as an input material for the production of cartons and related products. The decision emphasized that the final product of the process would be the cartons, not the kraft paper itself, aligning with established interpretations and consistent legal principles. The Tribunal&#039;s judgment clarified the categorization of &quot;kraft paper&quot; as an input material for manufacturing processes, rejecting the Revenue&#039;s appeal and reinforcing compliance with regulatory requirements.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 30 May 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 16 Nov 2016 11:32:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=439435" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (8) TMI 1019 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=331635</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the permission granted under Cenvat Rules for sending kraft paper to a job worker for further processing into carton boxes, considering kraft paper as an input material for the production of cartons and related products. The decision emphasized that the final product of the process would be the cartons, not the kraft paper itself, aligning with established interpretations and consistent legal principles. The Tribunal&#039;s judgment clarified the categorization of &quot;kraft paper&quot; as an input material for manufacturing processes, rejecting the Revenue&#039;s appeal and reinforcing compliance with regulatory requirements.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 30 May 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=331635</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>