<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (8) TMI 1017 - CESTAT  ALLAHABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=331633</link>
    <description>Goods cleared on payment of full duty with affixed brand names could not be retrospectively treated as unbranded for recomputing aggregate clearances under the SSI exemption notification. Because the relevant assessments had attained finality and the Revenue had not challenged or revised them through the prescribed appellate or review process, the Tribunal held that such clearances could not be recharacterised to reopen turnover computation. The demand based on that reclassification was therefore unsustainable, the impugned order did not stand, and consequential relief followed for the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 27 May 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 29 Aug 2016 14:11:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=439433" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (8) TMI 1017 - CESTAT  ALLAHABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=331633</link>
      <description>Goods cleared on payment of full duty with affixed brand names could not be retrospectively treated as unbranded for recomputing aggregate clearances under the SSI exemption notification. Because the relevant assessments had attained finality and the Revenue had not challenged or revised them through the prescribed appellate or review process, the Tribunal held that such clearances could not be recharacterised to reopen turnover computation. The demand based on that reclassification was therefore unsustainable, the impugned order did not stand, and consequential relief followed for the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 27 May 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=331633</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>