<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (8) TMI 1016 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=331632</link>
    <description>The Tribunal balanced the appellant&#039;s rectification efforts with the need to uphold interest payment to prevent revenue loss. The penalty was set aside, and the interest levy was maintained, resulting in partial allowance of the appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 27 May 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 29 Aug 2016 12:50:13 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=439432" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (8) TMI 1016 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=331632</link>
      <description>The Tribunal balanced the appellant&#039;s rectification efforts with the need to uphold interest payment to prevent revenue loss. The penalty was set aside, and the interest levy was maintained, resulting in partial allowance of the appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 27 May 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=331632</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>