https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=331630 The Tribunal allowed Cenvat Credit for garden maintenance and gutter cleaning services, citing a previous order in favor of the appellant. However, the Tribunal rejected the claim for Cenvat Credit on service tax paid for carpet cleaning services, demanding repayment of the amount with interest but no penalty imposed due to interpretational issues. The judgment underscores the significance of consistent decisions and adherence to eligibility criteria for Cenvat Credit availment. en-us Tue, 24 May 2016 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 27 Dec 2016 10:19:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=331630 The Tribunal allowed Cenvat Credit for garden maintenance and gutter cleaning services, citing a previous order in favor of the appellant. However, the Tribunal rejected the claim for Cenvat Credit on service tax paid for carpet cleaning services, demanding repayment of the amount with interest but no penalty imposed due to interpretational issues. The judgment underscores the significance of consistent decisions and adherence to eligibility criteria for Cenvat Credit availment. Case-Laws Central Excise Tue, 24 May 2016 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=331630