<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (8) TMI 1003 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=331619</link>
    <description>The court determined that the assessee&#039;s transactions in shares were investments, not trading activities. The income from the sale of shares was classified as capital gains, aligning with established tests and the CBDT Circular. The court ruled in favor of the appellant, setting aside the Tribunal&#039;s decision and restoring the CIT(A)&#039;s classification of the income as capital gains.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 08 Jun 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Nov 2017 18:48:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=439412" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (8) TMI 1003 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=331619</link>
      <description>The court determined that the assessee&#039;s transactions in shares were investments, not trading activities. The income from the sale of shares was classified as capital gains, aligning with established tests and the CBDT Circular. The court ruled in favor of the appellant, setting aside the Tribunal&#039;s decision and restoring the CIT(A)&#039;s classification of the income as capital gains.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 08 Jun 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=331619</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>