<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (8) TMI 1002 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=331618</link>
    <description>The tribunal dismissed the revenue&#039;s appeal as time-barred due to the delay in filing by the Assessing Officer. The tribunal also allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal regarding the disallowance of technical fees paid to YKK Holding Asia Pte Ltd, emphasizing that the Assessing Officer must accept the Transfer Pricing Officer&#039;s determination of arm&#039;s length payments. The decision was rendered on 25th July 2016.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 25 Jul 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 06 Feb 2018 12:51:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=439411" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (8) TMI 1002 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=331618</link>
      <description>The tribunal dismissed the revenue&#039;s appeal as time-barred due to the delay in filing by the Assessing Officer. The tribunal also allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal regarding the disallowance of technical fees paid to YKK Holding Asia Pte Ltd, emphasizing that the Assessing Officer must accept the Transfer Pricing Officer&#039;s determination of arm&#039;s length payments. The decision was rendered on 25th July 2016.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 25 Jul 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=331618</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>