<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (9) TMI 1098 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=185801</link>
    <description>Article 58 of the Limitation Act, 1963 was applied to hold that limitation for a declaratory suit begins when the right to sue first accrues, not on successive threats or later discovery of the same claim. On the stated facts, awareness of the rival claim existed well before the suit, so the claim was time-barred. The appellants also failed to prove that the disputed land fell within the khasra numbers covered by their sale deed or that they were in lawful possession, as they produced no reliable demarcation material. Suppression of material facts and encroachment on public land also disentitled them to equitable injunctive relief.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 09 Sep 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 08 Aug 2023 15:44:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=439400" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (9) TMI 1098 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=185801</link>
      <description>Article 58 of the Limitation Act, 1963 was applied to hold that limitation for a declaratory suit begins when the right to sue first accrues, not on successive threats or later discovery of the same claim. On the stated facts, awareness of the rival claim existed well before the suit, so the claim was time-barred. The appellants also failed to prove that the disputed land fell within the khasra numbers covered by their sale deed or that they were in lawful possession, as they produced no reliable demarcation material. Suppression of material facts and encroachment on public land also disentitled them to equitable injunctive relief.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 09 Sep 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=185801</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>