https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=185800 Cancellation of bail is justified not only by supervening conduct such as tampering with evidence or interference with justice, but also where the bail order itself is seriously infirm. If the granting court ignores relevant prima facie material, relies on irrelevant considerations, or passes a perverse order without adequate reasons, the discretion is vulnerable to cancellation even without post-release misconduct. Here, the court failed to deal with Section 164 statements and other material bearing on the accused's involvement, so the bail order was treated as arbitrary in a heinous crime and was liable to be quashed, with custody to follow. en-us Tue, 16 Oct 2012 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 14 Jul 2023 10:23:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=185800 Cancellation of bail is justified not only by supervening conduct such as tampering with evidence or interference with justice, but also where the bail order itself is seriously infirm. If the granting court ignores relevant prima facie material, relies on irrelevant considerations, or passes a perverse order without adequate reasons, the discretion is vulnerable to cancellation even without post-release misconduct. Here, the court failed to deal with Section 164 statements and other material bearing on the accused's involvement, so the bail order was treated as arbitrary in a heinous crime and was liable to be quashed, with custody to follow. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 16 Oct 2012 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=185800