<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (8) TMI 991 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=331607</link>
    <description>The court directed the petitioner to deposit a specific amount, leading to a stay on further coercive measures under Section 87 of the Finance Act. The petitioner complied, preventing coercive actions. The court ordered no further coercive measures until the adjudication process is completed within six weeks. The judgment dismissed the petition, emphasizing a balanced approach to address concerns while upholding legal procedures.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 01 Aug 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 19 Nov 2016 18:44:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=439390" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (8) TMI 991 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=331607</link>
      <description>The court directed the petitioner to deposit a specific amount, leading to a stay on further coercive measures under Section 87 of the Finance Act. The petitioner complied, preventing coercive actions. The court ordered no further coercive measures until the adjudication process is completed within six weeks. The judgment dismissed the petition, emphasizing a balanced approach to address concerns while upholding legal procedures.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 01 Aug 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=331607</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>