<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (8) TMI 989 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=331605</link>
    <description>CESTAT Mumbai ruled in favor of an airline appellant regarding service tax demand on computer reservation system services received from foreign providers. The tribunal held that CRS activities constitute online information and database access services under reverse charge mechanism, following British Airways precedent. The court accepted revenue neutrality argument, noting appellant could claim CENVAT credit for service tax paid under reverse charge while being liable for output service tax, creating a neutral position. Appeal was disposed of in appellant&#039;s favor.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 29 Jul 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 03 Jun 2025 09:08:10 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=439388" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (8) TMI 989 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=331605</link>
      <description>CESTAT Mumbai ruled in favor of an airline appellant regarding service tax demand on computer reservation system services received from foreign providers. The tribunal held that CRS activities constitute online information and database access services under reverse charge mechanism, following British Airways precedent. The court accepted revenue neutrality argument, noting appellant could claim CENVAT credit for service tax paid under reverse charge while being liable for output service tax, creating a neutral position. Appeal was disposed of in appellant&#039;s favor.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 29 Jul 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=331605</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>