https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=185796 Clause 11B of the Iron and Steel (Control of Production and Distribution) Order, 1941 was upheld because the parent scheme under the Essential Supplies (Temporary Powers) Act, 1946 disclosed a clear policy of maintaining supplies and securing equitable distribution at fair prices. The delegated and sub-delegated price-control power was therefore not excessive or unguided, as clause 11B formed part of an integrated regulatory framework for maximum price fixation and related adjustments. The measure was also held not to infringe Article 19(1)(f) or Article 19(1)(g), because a controlled-price restriction serving the statutory object was not shown to be unreasonable. en-us Wed, 16 Dec 1959 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 27 Aug 2016 14:02:10 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=185796 Clause 11B of the Iron and Steel (Control of Production and Distribution) Order, 1941 was upheld because the parent scheme under the Essential Supplies (Temporary Powers) Act, 1946 disclosed a clear policy of maintaining supplies and securing equitable distribution at fair prices. The delegated and sub-delegated price-control power was therefore not excessive or unguided, as clause 11B formed part of an integrated regulatory framework for maximum price fixation and related adjustments. The measure was also held not to infringe Article 19(1)(f) or Article 19(1)(g), because a controlled-price restriction serving the statutory object was not shown to be unreasonable. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 16 Dec 1959 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=185796