<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (8) TMI 986 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=331602</link>
    <description>The Court dismissed the Writ Petitions as infructuous after the Government rejected the exemption request, allowing the petitioner to pursue claims before the appropriate Forum, including merits and limitations for future adjudication. The decision underscores addressing legal issues comprehensively through proper channels, ensuring fair resolution of excise duty liability on Tapioca Sago clearance.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 19 Jul 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 17 Nov 2016 17:13:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=439383" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (8) TMI 986 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=331602</link>
      <description>The Court dismissed the Writ Petitions as infructuous after the Government rejected the exemption request, allowing the petitioner to pursue claims before the appropriate Forum, including merits and limitations for future adjudication. The decision underscores addressing legal issues comprehensively through proper channels, ensuring fair resolution of excise duty liability on Tapioca Sago clearance.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 19 Jul 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=331602</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>