<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (8) TMI 981 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=331597</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the interest recovery direction in the impugned order, affirming that interest was chargeable due to the admitted contravention of Rule 3(5) of the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004. The appeal was remanded for interest quantification, emphasizing the validity of the interest payment directive under Section 11AB of the Central Excise Act, 1944.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 01 Jun 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 27 Aug 2016 13:57:16 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=439378" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (8) TMI 981 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=331597</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the interest recovery direction in the impugned order, affirming that interest was chargeable due to the admitted contravention of Rule 3(5) of the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004. The appeal was remanded for interest quantification, emphasizing the validity of the interest payment directive under Section 11AB of the Central Excise Act, 1944.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 01 Jun 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=331597</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>