<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2007 (7) TMI 198 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=4596</link>
    <description>The tribunal found that the applicant did not have a case for a total waiver of pre-deposit as the contracts involved maintenance services. Specific amounts were directed to be deposited within six weeks for certain appeals, while pre-deposit was waived in two other appeals due to the limitation issue. Upon depositing the specified amounts, the remaining service tax amounts were waived, and the case was adjourned for further proceedings.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 16 Jul 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 15 Jul 2008 00:00:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=43937" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2007 (7) TMI 198 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=4596</link>
      <description>The tribunal found that the applicant did not have a case for a total waiver of pre-deposit as the contracts involved maintenance services. Specific amounts were directed to be deposited within six weeks for certain appeals, while pre-deposit was waived in two other appeals due to the limitation issue. Upon depositing the specified amounts, the remaining service tax amounts were waived, and the case was adjourned for further proceedings.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 16 Jul 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=4596</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>