<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2003 (1) TMI 718 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=185792</link>
    <description>Conviction for murder and allied offences was found unsafe where the prosecution relied on a sole related eyewitness whose trial version materially departed from the FIR and conflicted with the medical evidence. The Court also noted that the investigation was deficient, with no site plan, no chemical examination of bloodstained earth, no recovery of weapons, and no effective inquiry into possession of the disputed land, leaving the genesis of the uncertain. The accused were further prejudiced by an inadequate examination under Section 313 CrPC, as the incriminating material was not properly put to them. On this basis, the appellants were entitled to acquittal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 07 Jan 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 27 Aug 2016 13:08:09 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=439360" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2003 (1) TMI 718 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=185792</link>
      <description>Conviction for murder and allied offences was found unsafe where the prosecution relied on a sole related eyewitness whose trial version materially departed from the FIR and conflicted with the medical evidence. The Court also noted that the investigation was deficient, with no site plan, no chemical examination of bloodstained earth, no recovery of weapons, and no effective inquiry into possession of the disputed land, leaving the genesis of the uncertain. The accused were further prejudiced by an inadequate examination under Section 313 CrPC, as the incriminating material was not properly put to them. On this basis, the appellants were entitled to acquittal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 07 Jan 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=185792</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>