<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (11) TMI 948 - ITAT CHANDIGARH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=185790</link>
    <description>The ITAT dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeals, affirming the CIT(A)&#039;s deletion of the addition of Rs. 19,42,312 on account of long-term capital gain. The decision was based on the lack of evidence that the assessee received more than the declared consideration and the legal principles governing the determination of &quot;full value of the consideration.&quot;</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 29 Aug 2023 12:59:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=439358" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (11) TMI 948 - ITAT CHANDIGARH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=185790</link>
      <description>The ITAT dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeals, affirming the CIT(A)&#039;s deletion of the addition of Rs. 19,42,312 on account of long-term capital gain. The decision was based on the lack of evidence that the assessee received more than the declared consideration and the legal principles governing the determination of &quot;full value of the consideration.&quot;</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=185790</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>