<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2007 (6) TMI 533 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=185789</link>
    <description>Extra-judicial confession evidence can support conviction only when voluntary, clear, specific, unambiguous, and made before unbiased, credible witnesses. Material inconsistencies concerning the words used, place, surrounding circumstances, or possible witness animosity make reliance unsafe. Examination under Section 313 of the Code of Criminal Procedure must give the accused a fair opportunity to explain every material incriminating circumstance; a circumstance not specifically put to the accused cannot support conviction. Accordingly, an unsafe extra-judicial confession and unput kerosene-related evidence could not establish the charge beyond reasonable doubt, requiring the conviction to be set aside.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 06 Jun 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 27 Aug 2016 13:02:51 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=439357" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2007 (6) TMI 533 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=185789</link>
      <description>Extra-judicial confession evidence can support conviction only when voluntary, clear, specific, unambiguous, and made before unbiased, credible witnesses. Material inconsistencies concerning the words used, place, surrounding circumstances, or possible witness animosity make reliance unsafe. Examination under Section 313 of the Code of Criminal Procedure must give the accused a fair opportunity to explain every material incriminating circumstance; a circumstance not specifically put to the accused cannot support conviction. Accordingly, an unsafe extra-judicial confession and unput kerosene-related evidence could not establish the charge beyond reasonable doubt, requiring the conviction to be set aside.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 06 Jun 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=185789</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>