<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (8) TMI 966 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=331582</link>
    <description>The High Court set aside the Commissioner&#039;s rejection of the petitioner&#039;s application under Section 220(2A) of the Income Tax Act 1961, emphasizing the need for judicious consideration of genuine hardship and cooperation with tax proceedings. The Court found the rejection lacked sufficient reasoning and did not align with legal principles outlined by the Supreme Court, directing the Commissioner to reconsider the matter within two months.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 10 Aug 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 27 Aug 2016 12:46:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=439350" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (8) TMI 966 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=331582</link>
      <description>The High Court set aside the Commissioner&#039;s rejection of the petitioner&#039;s application under Section 220(2A) of the Income Tax Act 1961, emphasizing the need for judicious consideration of genuine hardship and cooperation with tax proceedings. The Court found the rejection lacked sufficient reasoning and did not align with legal principles outlined by the Supreme Court, directing the Commissioner to reconsider the matter within two months.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 10 Aug 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=331582</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>