<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (8) TMI 963 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=331579</link>
    <description>The appeal was dismissed as the court found that the issues raised did not present any substantial questions of law. The court upheld the decisions made by the Tribunal regarding the treatment of broken period expenses, the allowability of expenditure for reservation of seats, the taxation of interest income on securities, and the allowance of loss on revaluation of investments. The appellant&#039;s arguments were not entertained, and no costs were awarded in this case.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 01 Aug 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 27 Aug 2016 12:42:46 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=439345" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (8) TMI 963 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=331579</link>
      <description>The appeal was dismissed as the court found that the issues raised did not present any substantial questions of law. The court upheld the decisions made by the Tribunal regarding the treatment of broken period expenses, the allowability of expenditure for reservation of seats, the taxation of interest income on securities, and the allowance of loss on revaluation of investments. The appellant&#039;s arguments were not entertained, and no costs were awarded in this case.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 01 Aug 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=331579</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>