<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (8) TMI 957 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=331573</link>
    <description>The High Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision to treat undisclosed cash deposits in bank accounts as unexplained income from undisclosed sources. The court rejected the application of the peak credit principle due to lack of credible evidence and inconsistent explanations by the assessee. The tax appeal was dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 28 Jun 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 27 Aug 2016 12:31:48 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=439335" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (8) TMI 957 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=331573</link>
      <description>The High Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision to treat undisclosed cash deposits in bank accounts as unexplained income from undisclosed sources. The court rejected the application of the peak credit principle due to lack of credible evidence and inconsistent explanations by the assessee. The tax appeal was dismissed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 28 Jun 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=331573</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>