<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (5) TMI 1059 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=185780</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the disallowance of business promotion and foreign travel expenses due to lack of evidence supporting their business-related nature. The disallowance of repairs and renewals expenses was remitted back to the Assessing Officer for reevaluation to determine if they were capital or revenue in nature. The appellant was given a fair opportunity for reassessment.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 22 May 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 27 Aug 2016 12:17:19 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=439321" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (5) TMI 1059 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=185780</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the disallowance of business promotion and foreign travel expenses due to lack of evidence supporting their business-related nature. The disallowance of repairs and renewals expenses was remitted back to the Assessing Officer for reevaluation to determine if they were capital or revenue in nature. The appellant was given a fair opportunity for reassessment.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 22 May 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=185780</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>