<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (3) TMI 1107 - CESTAT HYDERABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=185782</link>
    <description>The Tribunal set aside the demand of interest on wrongly availed and reversed credit, aligning with precedents like Bill Forge (P) Ltd. and Strategic Engineering case. The appeal was allowed with consequential reliefs, clarifying the issue of interest payment on such credits.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 14 Mar 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 27 Aug 2016 12:17:19 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=439319" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (3) TMI 1107 - CESTAT HYDERABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=185782</link>
      <description>The Tribunal set aside the demand of interest on wrongly availed and reversed credit, aligning with precedents like Bill Forge (P) Ltd. and Strategic Engineering case. The appeal was allowed with consequential reliefs, clarifying the issue of interest payment on such credits.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 14 Mar 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=185782</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>