https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=185771 The appellant, a high-ranking officer in the Indian Revenue Service, faced compulsory retirement due to alleged derelictions in duty. The Screening Committee focused on specific instances but the Court found insufficient evidence to support the decision. The Court rejected allegations of mala fides by the Screening Committee and emphasized the need for sufficient evidence in compulsory retirement cases. The appeal was allowed, the order of premature compulsory retirement was set aside, and the department was directed to determine the reliefs for the appellant. en-us Tue, 01 Sep 1998 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 27 Aug 2016 11:13:27 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=185771 The appellant, a high-ranking officer in the Indian Revenue Service, faced compulsory retirement due to alleged derelictions in duty. The Screening Committee focused on specific instances but the Court found insufficient evidence to support the decision. The Court rejected allegations of mala fides by the Screening Committee and emphasized the need for sufficient evidence in compulsory retirement cases. The appeal was allowed, the order of premature compulsory retirement was set aside, and the department was directed to determine the reliefs for the appellant. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 01 Sep 1998 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=185771