<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (6) TMI 830 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=185762</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal ITAT Mumbai upheld the CIT(A) decision in favor of the assessee regarding tax liability under the India-US DTAA for payments made by an Indian branch to a US-based entity. The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeals, citing consistent precedent and lack of distinguishable features, ruling that the payments constituted &#039;business profits&#039; under Article 7 and were not taxable in India due to the absence of a Permanent Establishment.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 10 Jun 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 26 Aug 2016 18:40:11 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=439294" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (6) TMI 830 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=185762</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal ITAT Mumbai upheld the CIT(A) decision in favor of the assessee regarding tax liability under the India-US DTAA for payments made by an Indian branch to a US-based entity. The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeals, citing consistent precedent and lack of distinguishable features, ruling that the payments constituted &#039;business profits&#039; under Article 7 and were not taxable in India due to the absence of a Permanent Establishment.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 10 Jun 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=185762</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>