<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (8) TMI 1214 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=185755</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the appeals filed by the assessee, upholding the decisions of the lower authorities on all contested issues. The interest income on term deposits was not considered eligible for deduction u/s 10A as it was not derived from the business undertaking. The claim for netting interest receipts was rejected as the deposits were surplus funds unrelated to business activities. Other issues raised by the assessee, including foreign exchange rate differences, deduction for sale of scrap, disallowance of software expenses, computation of book profit u/s 115JB, and provision of leave encashment, were also dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 12 Aug 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 26 Aug 2016 17:41:01 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=439284" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (8) TMI 1214 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=185755</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the appeals filed by the assessee, upholding the decisions of the lower authorities on all contested issues. The interest income on term deposits was not considered eligible for deduction u/s 10A as it was not derived from the business undertaking. The claim for netting interest receipts was rejected as the deposits were surplus funds unrelated to business activities. Other issues raised by the assessee, including foreign exchange rate differences, deduction for sale of scrap, disallowance of software expenses, computation of book profit u/s 115JB, and provision of leave encashment, were also dismissed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 12 Aug 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=185755</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>