<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Nepalese suppliers billing separately for transport doesn&#039;t classify appellants as GTA service recipients; no service tax due.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=30942</link>
    <description>Just because the Nepalese suppliers had billed the appellants separately for transportation from Nepal border to factory premises alongwith other expenses, they do not become the agents of the appellants - tappellants cannot be treated as recipients of GTA services in terms of Notification No. 35/04-S.T. – appellant not liable to pay service tax - AT</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 26 Aug 2016 15:48:53 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 26 Aug 2016 15:48:53 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=439269" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Nepalese suppliers billing separately for transport doesn&#039;t classify appellants as GTA service recipients; no service tax due.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=30942</link>
      <description>Just because the Nepalese suppliers had billed the appellants separately for transportation from Nepal border to factory premises alongwith other expenses, they do not become the agents of the appellants - tappellants cannot be treated as recipients of GTA services in terms of Notification No. 35/04-S.T. – appellant not liable to pay service tax - AT</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 26 Aug 2016 15:48:53 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=30942</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>