<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (8) TMI 939 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=331555</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, allowing their refund claim under Rule 5 of the Cenvat Credit Rules for goods cleared to a 100% EOU. The Tribunal held that clearances to 100% EOUs should be considered exports, entitling the appellant to a refund of unutilized cenvat credit. Previous judgments, including one by the Hon&#039;ble Gujarat High Court, supported this view. The Tribunal set aside the lower authorities&#039; decision and allowed the appeal, emphasizing that the provisions of Rule 5 applied to supplies to 100% EOUs without duty payment.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 09 Aug 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 06 Jan 2017 12:49:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=439254" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (8) TMI 939 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=331555</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, allowing their refund claim under Rule 5 of the Cenvat Credit Rules for goods cleared to a 100% EOU. The Tribunal held that clearances to 100% EOUs should be considered exports, entitling the appellant to a refund of unutilized cenvat credit. Previous judgments, including one by the Hon&#039;ble Gujarat High Court, supported this view. The Tribunal set aside the lower authorities&#039; decision and allowed the appeal, emphasizing that the provisions of Rule 5 applied to supplies to 100% EOUs without duty payment.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 09 Aug 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=331555</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>